Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 4NF is Where It Is At! [WAS Re: 1:1 relationships]

Re: 4NF is Where It Is At! [WAS Re: 1:1 relationships]

From: Peter Franklin <p.franklinDeleteThis_at_which.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:22:49 GMT
Message-ID: <3a894fe7.934368@news.which.net>

I have been watching this thread hoping to be enlightened as to what 4NF actually is, as I have never been able to understand Date's definition. All the time I couldn't see where this example differed from "plain good old 3NF", but put this down to my stupidity.

Thank you, Jan :-)

Peter Franklin

On 13 Feb 2001 09:32:54 GMT, hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.win.tue.nl (Jan Hidders) wrote:

>Barry wrote:
>> Jan Hidders wrote:
>
> . . snip . . .
>
>So what you have been talking about all this time is nothing else then
>plain good old 3NF. :-)
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 13 2001 - 09:22:49 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US