Re: Many to Many with a Twist

From: Van Messner <vmessnerNOvmSPAM_at_discovernet.com.invalid>
Date: 2000/07/21
Message-ID: <3cbf99c4.ca02cb89_at_usw-ex0106-046.remarq.com>#1/1

Thanks very much for the advice. I thought of subclassing, but C, R and B are very different, and there are almost no common columns. The superclass would be a completely artificial device. Would a superclass then still be a "better" solution?

Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com. Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com Received on Fri Jul 21 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marc Tardif: "Re: High Speed Text Searching Algorythms..."
Previous message: Philip Lijnzaad: "Re: Many to Many with a Twist"
Maybe in reply to: Van Messner: "Many to Many with a Twist"
Next in thread: p.forestall: "Re: Many to Many with a Twist"
Reply: p.forestall: "Re: Many to Many with a Twist"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message