Re: Surrogate Keys

Hi David.

You might be mad at Neil, but I'm sure others (including myself) would be interested in where Access falls shorter from Codd's ideal than other databases advertised as being relational. I promise not to snap if I disagree (I doubt I'm qualified to disagree!). I just don't think I've ever seen such a list and I'd be very interested.

Thank you,
Jon Myers

David Cressey wrote in message ...
>Um...Gee Whiz... It must have been a bad day for you!
>
>The part of my message that you quoted is precisely the part where I
>DEPART from a doctrinaire stance to say that I use ACCESS for certain
>practical things.
>
>All relational products fall short of the glory of Codd, but some fall
>shorter than others.
>Since you don't seem to be interested by such arguments, let's just skip
>it.
>
>Every now and then, when ACCESS bites you, just consider it to be another
>bad day.
>
Received on Thu Jun 01 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST