Re: Is a Query langauge really necessary in an OODB?

From: Jim McKay <JMcKay_at_California.com>
Date: 2000/03/28
Message-ID: <38E18A9D.1EF87DD7_at_California.com>#1/1


> I know (from other posts/threads) you don't have much use for OO, but
> an overriding principle of good OO design is: Object shall implement
> their own behavior. The current crop of tools have it backwards.
> Rather than the report generator using some method (SQL) to reach
> inside my object (record),

An SQL call is not reaching 'inside your object (record)', it's making a call to (usually) the DB engine. This is not anti OOP.

JM

> my object should create and pass a view of
> itself to the report generator (which is responsible for layout). Thus
> the 'generic' capability is not dependent upon a standard method (SQL)
> of violating encapsulation.

> --
> Brian Price
>
> Have compiler will travel.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- Received on Tue Mar 28 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message