Re: OO fans bashing Joins

topmind <topmindNOtoSPAM_at_technologist.com.invalid> wrote in message news:0110ea04.187c7858_at_usw-ex0104-031.remarq.com...
>
> >> You're not listening. I said it was people thing rather than
> a technological thing. <<
>
> So you are admitting that procedural/relational programming can
> be just a reuse friendly as OO?

I never said otherwise. Actually, that's what I've been trying to convey although OO users are probably more atuned to the concept of reuse just from all the dialog on it in those circles.

> >> Oh, but those are the ones are coming from the decidedly
> wrong paradigm of procedural programming. It's harder to play
> the song correctly if you've first learned to play it
> incorrectly or have picked up bad habits. :) <<
>
> Yeah, whatever. OO is an annoying fad the belongs only in
> specific niches. All those stupid animal and shape examples do
> not translate into real world benefits, they only sell the crap
> to naive PHB's who like a good story.

Hehe..

Tony Received on Thu Mar 16 2000 - 00:00:00 CET