Re: OO fans bashing Joins
From: Tony <tony_at_my.isp>
Date: 2000/03/14
Message-ID: <kWvz4.1557$KK.119244_at_bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>#1/1
Date: 2000/03/14
Message-ID: <kWvz4.1557$KK.119244_at_bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>#1/1
topmind <topmindNOtoSPAM_at_technologist.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:2b039368.c1798f4d_at_usw-ex0103-018.remarq.com...
>
> >Seriously, it can do so IF you succeed in developing
> >abstractions that you can reuse.
>
> There is no evidence that OO increases reuse.
Read my above statement again. I even capitalized "IF" for you. I believe I went on to say that if one is bad at reusing code in procedural/structural paradigms, then the same will probably occur with the OO paradigm if they use it.
> There are some types of problems that OO does well at, but I do
> not find these patterns in my niche for the most part.