Re: OO fans bashing Joins

That's right it does. Usually extremism doesn't serve very well. But enough dialog
on last decade's issue.

Tony

topmind <topmindNOtoSPAM_at_technologist.com.invalid> wrote in message news:08a5de0c.dce09110_at_usw-ex0101-006.remarq.com...
> In article <Jthz4.408$KK.30453_at_bgtnsc06-
> news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Tony" <tony_at_my.isp> wrote:
> >
> >topmind <topmindNOtoSPAM_at_technologist.com.invalid> wrote in
 message
> >news:028e5900.7d7dac63_at_usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com...
> >> In article <38c4407b.23364041_at_news.shuswap.net>,
> >> genew_at_shuswap.net (Gene Wirchenko) wrote:
 

> >> Only if the real world fits into the artificial groupings and
> >> boundaries that classes and methods provide. My observation is
> >> that real world change patterns *don't* fit these well,
 making a
> >> bigger mess than OO's competitors.
> >
> >OO doesn't "provide" these. The developer does. There's no
 limit on
> >what kinds of abstractions one can create, real-life
 abstractions or not.
> >
> >Tony
> >
> >
>
> This includes modeling them *without* OO and it's overhyped,
> language-bloating religion.
>
> -tmind-
>
>
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network
 *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
>
Received on Tue Mar 14 2000 - 00:00:00 CET