Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.oracle -> Re: Comparison of DB2 and Oracle?

Re: Comparison of DB2 and Oracle?

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:24:51 GMT
Message-ID: <Tzifd.6802$HA.6215@attbi_s01>

"michael newport" <michaelnewport_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:63b202d.0410250221.4ded17ea_at_posting.google.com...
> http://tpc.org/information/other/articles/TopTen.asp
>
> The performance of databases is one issue, pricing is another. (Ingres
> is FREE)
>
> TPC results should not be used as a substitute for benchmarking of
> one's own application if performance is a critical decision criteria
>
>
> Michael

If this is the same Ingres I used awhile ago I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole even if you paid me. The concurrency model sucks, start a transaction, insert a record, lock 95% of the table if it has a primary key - because the page locks on the index locks most of the pages. NO ONE ELSE COULD GET ANY WORK DONE, unless you threw out the transaction model and went to auto commit. POS.
Jim Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:24:51 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US