Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.oracle -> Re: Comparison of DB2 and Oracle?

Re: Comparison of DB2 and Oracle?

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:36:35 GMT
Message-ID: <DuZdd.293200$D%.251608@attbi_s51>

"Serge Rielau" <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com> wrote in message news:2tq1noF234nkoU1_at_uni-berlin.de...
> Jim,
>
> I can't comment on DB2 for zOS. Would be interested to know whether this
> behaviour is still in existence and whether it was condidered working as
> designed or a bug (e.g. a bad lock).
> The behaviour you describe seems to indicate that users also wouldn't be
> able to bind static apps concurrently.....
>
> Cheers
> Serge

I can't tell you since I don't use DB2 anymore and we don't have a mainframe where I work. I would expect that DB2 would work the same regardless of OS. (not counting OS limitations ) IBM didn't consider it a bug. I was doing work for American Transtech at the time (a subsidiary of ATT, certainly a large enough customer to get attention). People couldn't bind apps concurrently, but since the machine was fast enough people wouldn't notice. Jim Received on Thu Oct 21 2004 - 20:36:35 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US