Re: Newbie question
From: Mark C. Stock <mcstockX_at_Xenquery>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:28:52 -0400
Message-ID: <_YednZx5u7wg58HcRVn-pw_at_comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:28:52 -0400
Message-ID: <_YednZx5u7wg58HcRVn-pw_at_comcast.com>
"ERD" <erd_at_nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9574AEB351DD0glnospamnet_at_216.196.97.131...
| Yes I finally figured out the cascade constraints.
| Thanks for that select statement.
|
| Question: does this imply that the RI in the relationship was not defined
| correctly?
|
|
|
not at all -- its not abnormal to need to use cascade constraints option if FKs still exist, and its not abnormal if a table in another schema has FK constraints
did you find out which table has the FK before you used the 'cascade constraints' option?
++ mcs Received on Thu Sep 30 2004 - 23:28:52 CEST