Re: db2 vs oracle

From: Data Goob <datagoob_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:07:23 -0400
Message-ID: <ETpYc.3444$ky5.2527_at_fe02.usenetserver.com>


Daniel,

Did it ever occur to you that you butted into a conversation as an uninvited guest? ( on several different points I might add )

Wouldn't it be better to let Mark speak for himself? He was on a roll and I was getting some good information into the mind of Oracle marketing.

If you must butt in, show some courtesy and at least have the decency to put your drink down before ranting instead of spilling it all over people. Dear god man.

Anyway, I do appreciate your passion as well as Marks' but the devil is in the details where I come from. Marketing is wonderful but eventually Oracle has to pony up with reality. Sun is going through their reality check, along with SCO, for Oracle it's just a matter of time. Larry doesn't have a vision for the future because his vision has come and gone. Once he steps aside the company can morph, but if he stays too long it'll be the end of it. Sun missed it, SCO missed it, Unisys, DEC, the list gets longer every day. As Gordon Gecko said, it's not the survival of the unfittest.

Daniel Morgan wrote:
> Data Goob wrote:
>

>> Mark Townsend wrote:
>>
>>> Data Goob wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually to get you back on track, read through Larry's book, the 
>>>> words are
>>>> in the book, not quoting, but close enough, Oracle is more about 
>>>> applications
>>>> than databases.  ( the book is "SOFTWAR" )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have the book. I have read the book. If you like to send me an 
>>> address offline, I'll send it to you. Then you can actually quote 
>>> chapter and verse to your heart's content.
>>>
>> Thanks but no thanks.  I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour
>> de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about
>> Larry and his obsessions for a while.   It's a bit confusing to me
>> when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well,
>> are they passionate about the marketing or the technology?   ( I think I
>> already know the answer, no need to reply. )

>
>
> Away with the facade of caring about truth and accuracy? This is the new
> century and if politicans and lawyers can ignore the facts why not you
> too is what I take away from your comment.
Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 21:07:23 CEST

Original text of this message