Re: db2 vs oracle
From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:27:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1093800490.71033_at_yasure>
> Thanks but no thanks. I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour
> de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about
> Larry and his obsessions for a while. It's a bit confusing to me
> when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well,
> are they passionate about the marketing or the technology? ( I think I
> already know the answer, no need to reply. )
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:27:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1093800490.71033_at_yasure>
Data Goob wrote:
> Mark Townsend wrote:
>
>> Data Goob wrote: >> >>> >>> Actually to get you back on track, read through Larry's book, the >>> words are >>> in the book, not quoting, but close enough, Oracle is more about >>> applications >>> than databases. ( the book is "SOFTWAR" ) >>> >>> >> >> I have the book. I have read the book. If you like to send me an >> address offline, I'll send it to you. Then you can actually quote >> chapter and verse to your heart's content. >>
> Thanks but no thanks. I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour
> de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about
> Larry and his obsessions for a while. It's a bit confusing to me
> when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well,
> are they passionate about the marketing or the technology? ( I think I
> already know the answer, no need to reply. )
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 19:27:14 CEST