Re: db2 vs oracle
From: Hans Forbrich <forbrich_at_yahoo.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:15:29 GMT
Message-ID: <5%aYc.71113$X12.14547_at_edtnps84>
> Thanks but no thanks. I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour
> de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about
> Larry and his obsessions for a while. It's a bit confusing to me
> when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well,
> are they passionate about the marketing or the technology? ( I think I
> already know the answer, no need to reply. )
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:15:29 GMT
Message-ID: <5%aYc.71113$X12.14547_at_edtnps84>
Data Goob wrote:
>> Data Goob wrote: >> >>> >>> Actually to get you back on track, read through Larry's book, the >>> words are >>> in the book, not quoting, but close enough, Oracle is more about >>> applications >>> than databases. ( the book is "SOFTWAR" ) >>> >>> >> >> I have the book. I have read the book. If you like to send me an address >> offline, I'll send it to you. Then you can actually quote chapter and >> verse to your heart's content. >>
> Thanks but no thanks. I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour
> de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about
> Larry and his obsessions for a while. It's a bit confusing to me
> when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well,
> are they passionate about the marketing or the technology? ( I think I
> already know the answer, no need to reply. )
Proof, once again - ignorance is bliss. After all, why use proof when insinuation, innuendo and implication are so useful.
Thanks for the wonderfully amusing thread. /Hans Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 04:15:29 CEST