| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.oracle -> What is the bottom line on Oracle layout on Virtual Arrays?
What is the *truth* when it comes to configuring Oracle files on an Enterprise Virtual Array like an HP EVA3000 or EVA5000 or an EMC Symmetrix frame.
As I Understand It -
A Virtual Array is a storage appliance with a large number of disks
(say over 50), dual-path controller access and, significantly, a very
large disk cache. The cache is supported by front-end and back-end
(disk-side) processors and a range of algorithms that aim to keep all
read and write disk access via the cache.
And this is not RAID. It's a definite storage evolution. The VA presents the virtual disks to hosts connected via switched fabric. The virtual disks have the apparent behaviour of different RAID levels, e.g. 0, 1 and RAID-5. HP calls these settings Vraid0, VRaid1 and VRaid5. How they are actually implemented is left to the VA.
In a search for sanity, I have read opinion, history ancient and modern, experts' comment and practitioners' experiences. This seems to be a hot topic but it seems that the following need to be verified or de-bunked:
My plan is to review experiences and try to test some options before my next EVA is built. It looks like the book on storage and Oracle has been rewritten yet again.
Many thanks,
Peter Hitchmough
"Why are there marks against these errors in the Error Messages
manual?"
"I'm trying to collect the set."
Received on Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:30:35 CST
![]() |
![]() |