Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.

hmm, strange, my DB2 production system on AIX hasn't crashed for 3 years now.
I guess your comapny was right :-)

Peter wrote:

>Friends!
>
>I am not anti DB2. It is a good
>database on Main Frames system.
>
>System crash, if it has not happened on your
>production server running DB2 so far, please
>wait for 6-8 months.
>
>
>Peter
>
>
>
>wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au (Noons) wrote in message news:<73e20c6c.0309112234.77eaa91e_at_posting.google.com>...
>
>
>>"Mark A" <ma_at_switchboard.net> wrote in message news:<pr48b.409$SZ.32376_at_news.uswest.net>...
>>
>>
>>>"Peter" <peter_and_john2003_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:396cd6da.0309111138.59804915_at_posting.google.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
>>>>The bottom line is when you do select, the system crash.
>>>>
>>>>I think it may take 4-5 years for DB2 to reach Oracle standard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Maybe it's a problem with the DBA's.
>>>
>>>
>>x-post trimmed in the interests of sanity...
>>
>>
>>I thought DB2 didn't need DBAs, that was just another
>>"expensive option" needed only for Oracle?
>>Tsk,tsk, there goes the TCO crap...
>>
>>Cheers
>>Nuno Souto
>>wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
>>
>>

-- 
Anton Versteeg
IBM Certified DB2 Specialist
IBM Netherlands