Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.

From: Peter <peter_and_john2003_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 15 Sep 2003 12:46:31 -0700
Message-ID: <396cd6da.0309151146.30e04e41_at_posting.google.com>


Hi Larry!

ISVs like Siebel and Peoplesoft develop on DB2, it sounds great but can you tell me what all features of DB2 that they are using other than backup and restore. In DB2 for web enabled application to communicate, you need IBM MQ series and 5-10 experts for MQ administration and development work. IBM doesn't tell the actual cost to buy and maintain MQ to the customers during initial sales meeting.

I think INFORMIX is a better and stable product of IBM on non Main Frames system. In DB2, when instance disappear the simple soution is to resrat it by db2start command. There are many companies that can effort it in production so they will not mind it at all.

Peter

"Andrew Hamm" <ahamm_at_mail.com> wrote in message news:<bk39q9$oq4r4$1_at_ID-79573.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> Obnoxio The Clown wrote:
> >
> >[SNIP]
> > very large BMW because I have a very small willy. Market share played
> >[SNIP]
> > However, market share *is* important for ISVs and third party
> > developers -- they are reluctant to develop on and support a platform
> > that doesn't give them broad exposure to the market. Conversely, this
> >[SNIP]
>
> How horrible; OTC talking about his very small willy, and broad exposure, in
> the same message. I need an aspirin and a good lie down....
Received on Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:46:31 CEST

Original text of this message