Re: SQL differences between 8i and 9i

From: george lewycky <gelewyc_at_nyct.com>
Date: 12 Jun 2003 13:19:05 -0700
Message-ID: <68aecc05.0306121219.16b79a72_at_posting.google.com>


I read in PL/SQL manual that 9i has more inner/outer join features

george

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com> wrote in message news:<cw_Fa.1209962$F1.143157_at_sccrnsc04>...
> is valuedate a date field?(and if it is a string field with a date in it
> then double ugh) If so don't compare dates and strings. Dates are dates
> and strings are strings. If you are relying on such comparison (dates vs
> strings) then you are depending upon some default date format specification.
> (which is probably why it does not work) Instead use to_date on the strings
> eg
> to_date('20060507','yyyymmdd')
> > VALUEDATE >= to_date('20000613','yyyymmdd') AND VALUEDATE <=
> to_date('20060507','yyyymmdd'),
> ...
> Jim
>
>
> --
> Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
> with family. Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure
> it out.
> "Tom Geyzen" <tomgeyzen_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2c8b4611.0306120056.21808339_at_posting.google.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got an application running on Oracle 9i which used nested queries
> > with aggregate functions. I now have to make the app run on Oracle 8.
> >
> > This kind of query doesn't run anymore :
> >
> > SELECT SUM(Count) AS GRAND_Total,
> > (SELECT SUM(Count) AS Total_OK FROM TABLE1 WHERE STATUS = 'OK' AND
> > VALUEDATE >= '20000613' AND VALUEDATE <= '20060507'),
> > (SELECT SUM(Count) AS Total_SKIP FROM TABLE1 WHERE STATUS = 'SKIP' AND
> > VALUEDATE >= '20000613' AND VALUEDATE <= '20060507'),
> > (SELECT SUM(Count) AS Total_HIT FROM TABLE1 WHERE STATUS <> 'OK' AND
> > STATUS <> 'SKIP' AND VALUEDATE >= '20000613' AND VALUEDATE <=
> > '20060507')
> > FROM TABLE1 WHERE VALUEDATE >= '20000613' AND VALUEDATE <=
> > '20060507'GROUP BY 1
> >
> >
> > It runs fine on 9i...
> >
> > Any advice on how to convert this to work under 8i would be
> > appreciated ...
> >
> > tia,
> >
> > Tom
Received on Thu Jun 12 2003 - 22:19:05 CEST

Original text of this message