Re: Impact of changed index inital extent

From: Rogbaker <Rogbaker_at_gdi.net>
Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:05:06 -0700
Message-ID: <e40a12ea.0304171005.62fe4337_at_posting.google.com>

I agree, I read on Oracle's Ask Tom website. He said thousands of extents are okay.

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com> wrote in message news:<bRnna.480293$3D1.259981_at_sccrnsc01>...
> Myth. The number of extents is irrelevant.
> Jim
>
Received on Thu Apr 17 2003 - 20:05:06 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Peter: "How do you specify the maximum number of redo log files for automatic recovery in the initialization file?"
Previous message: Sateesh Kumar: "Re: Help in UTL_FILE"
Maybe in reply to: Daniel Roy: "Re: Impact of changed index inital extent"
In reply to Frank: "Re: Impact of changed index inital extent"
Next in thread: TC: "Re: Database Link and Service"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message