Re: OCI_BATCH_ERRORS drawbacks.
From: Justin Cave <jocave_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 29 Oct 2002 02:47:07 -0800
Message-ID: <233b7a65.0210290247.6cd162b2_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 29 Oct 2002 02:47:07 -0800
Message-ID: <233b7a65.0210290247.6cd162b2_at_posting.google.com>
Alexander.Kuznetsov_at_marshmc.com (Alexander Kuznetsov) wrote in message news:<ac5bc7c1.0210281230.3b587abf_at_posting.google.com>...
> Is anyone using this feature yet?
> Was anybody considering OCI_BATCH_ERRORS but then decided against using it?
I've used this feature without a problem, though I don't normally use it. It all depends on your application logic. Most of the apps I've written wouldn't want a subset of their batch committed, often because the various statements were related in some way. If every statement of your batch is completely independent, I wouldn't hesitate to use OCI_BATCH_ERRORS. Justin Cave Received on Tue Oct 29 2002 - 11:47:07 CET