Re: Informix limitations, should we be using Oracle?

From: Obnoxio The Clown <obnoxio_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:08:03 +0100
Message-ID: <3DADAB03.10408_at_hotmail.com>


Rob Vorbroker wrote:
> See comments below:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-informix-list_at_iiug.org
> [mailto:owner-informix-list_at_iiug.org]On Behalf Of Obnoxio The Clown
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:55 AM
> To: informix-list_at_iiug.org
> Subject: Re: Informix limitations, should we be using Oracle?
>
>
> Andrew Hamm wrote:
>

>>Obnoxio The Clown wrote:
>>
>>
>>>To be honest, it really doesn't look like anyone in your team knows
>>>XPS, can I recommend that you employ someone who does, even if it's
>>>just for an initial learning curve. Try jparker at artentech dot com
>>>or tim at datad dot com .
>>>
>>
>>
>>hmmm - would that be the tim which previously burnt this bridge before

>
> he'd
>
>>even read the map???
>>
>>How's about RedBrick - you've played with that. Will it be worthy on a
>>single node for his app?

>
>
> Depends on if they have a star schema. If they have, RedBrick will be a
> good fit, if they haven't.... <puke>
>
> Rob:
> It (Red Brick) is what it is and does what it does and very well.
> It is NOT an OLTP database - If you have a Star Schema, even a SnowFlake,
> config for your Data Warehouse it works fantastic.
>
> If you have a joint OLTP/DW config - use something else.
> You wouldn't hammer with a penknife would you?

Isn't that what i said? Received on Wed Oct 16 2002 - 20:08:03 CEST

Original text of this message