Re: Oracle on UNIX vs NT/2000

From: Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: 30 Jan 2002 00:34:25 -0800
Message-ID: <a20d28ee.0201300034.1110426c_at_posting.google.com>

vadolt_at_yahoo.com (vdolt) wrote in message news:<25903991.0201291219.674d81a8_at_posting.google.com>...
> Does anyone has expirience with migrating Oracle from NT to
> Sun Solaris? Should I expect slow down or increase in performance?
> Is Sun more stable platform for Oracle that win 2000? Will I be able
> to migrate databases easily?
> Is there big difference in the actual DB administration?
> Any comments appreciated.
> Thank you.

There should be an increase in performance, and any Unix-based platform should be more stable than any Microsoft O/S There is no big difference, you will notice however you can accomplish much more by using shell scripts, as the shell language is much more flexible.

Hth

Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA Received on Wed Jan 30 2002 - 09:34:25 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Frank D. Greco: "Port of FOCUS db to Oracle... any tools available?"
Previous message: jingc3_at_yahoo.com: "Re: update from select not commited"
In reply to: vdolt: "Oracle on UNIX vs NT/2000"
In reply to vdolt: "Oracle on UNIX vs NT/2000"
Next in thread: David A. Levy: "Re: fist three higher values"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message