Re: Which platform is better?
From: Galen Boyer <galenboyer_at_hotpop.com>
Date: 26 Jul 2001 21:57:18 -0500
Message-ID: <u8zhazzj2.fsf_at_verizon.net>
Date: 26 Jul 2001 21:57:18 -0500
Message-ID: <u8zhazzj2.fsf_at_verizon.net>
On Tue, 22 May 2001, pjohnson_at_take.this.out.spasydell.net wrote:
> 2. Buy an new NT/2000 server. This is where I would know what
> I was talking about and able to make recommendations. I am
> looking at a dual Xeon 700mhz/1mb cache, 2+gb ram, 8 9gb hard
> drives configured for RAID 10. This should be a speedy box.
You would know what you are talking about with NT/2000? Thats enough for me to say go with it, but if you aren't doing the work and only recommending hardware, then the knowledge of the system lies with the people already employed and they know AIX, so stick with that. 50 concurrent heavy users should be handled fine by NT/2000.
-- Galen Boyer It seems to me, I remember every single thing I know.Received on Fri Jul 27 2001 - 04:57:18 CEST