Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

I'm a newbie; been doing oracle for 3 months. After using access, paradox, and oracle I've com to this insight: Oracle is less user friendly, much slower to develope in, more difficult to get information on, more expensive to use, pays better, and handles large tables better.

Thomas Kyte wrote in message <37a90280.21331683_at_newshost.us.oracle.com>...
>A copy of this was sent to killer796_at_yahoo.com
>(if that email address didn't require changing)
>On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 18:53:57 GMT, you wrote:
>
>>Um, I'm glad like you guys have a forum to vent your rage. Better here
>>than on the highway. But do you think maybe you could turn your 200
>>collective years of experience to answering some oracle questions. I
>>posted one this morning (Renaming Columns 8i) and there has been no
>>solutions posted from any of you eminent experts.
>>
>
>can't answer the impossible (actually, if you read this thread -- you'd
 know
>that you cannot rename a column :)
>
>rename of a column doesn't exist.
>
>Use a view, rename the table, create a view the name of the table, fix the
>column name in the view.
>
>>
>>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
>--
>See http://govt.us.oracle.com/~tkyte/ for my columns 'Digging-in to
 Oracle8i'...
>Current article is "Part I of V, Autonomous Transactions" updated June
 21'st
>
>Thomas Kyte tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
>Oracle Service Industries Reston, VA USA
>
>Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle
Corporation Received on Fri Jul 30 1999 - 00:00:00 CEST