Re: Which UNIX Oracle platform shall we get ?

From: MotoX <rat_at_tat.a-tat.com>
Date: 1998/07/16
Message-ID: <900576758.29613.0.nnrp-03.c2de712e_at_news.demon.co.uk>#1/1


Wrong! :-)

To be honest, all that was listed was a group of vendors. Nearly all of them could supply a system to meet the requirement. The original poster needs to go away and 'think' a bit, IMHO.

MotoX.

Terry Dykstra [TeamPS] wrote in message <35acf701.0_at_news.cadvision.com>...
>HP K series
>
>--
>Terry Dykstra [TeamPS]
>Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.
>Ed Zietarski wrote in message <35ace0e6.0_at_ispc-news.cableinet.net>...
>>We want to get a more powerful Oracle platform
>>to supersede an NT box.
>>
>>We are running real time applications.
>>
>>A rough ball park estimate is that there will be
>>up to 2000 database accesses per second
>>at peak times.
>>
>>The following contenders are being considered:
>>
>>Sun
>>HP
>>IBM
>>DEC
>>DG
>>Bull
>>Siemens
>>
>>Are there any other obvious ones that we have missed ?
>>
>>Any advice on choice ?
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thu Jul 16 1998 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message