Re: Informix vs. Sybase vs. Oracle vs. (gasp) MS SQL Server
Date: 1997/12/05
Message-ID: <3487C005.3CAB_at_agd.nsw.gov.au>#1/1
Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> You didn't answer the question Anthony. How can you tell exactly how a
> program operates on a database without reading the source?
>
> EXACTLY - OPERATES ON DATABASE - ANSWER
I was saving this response for someone but never mind, you'll do.
So you honestly want me to believe that you're unfamiliar with the practice and methodology of reverse engineering? Where you aren't allowed (or cannot possibly, because it isn't publically available) to just look at source code and duplicate a product to the same specification. So, then, what were Compaq really doing when they claimed to have reverse engineered IBM's ROM BIOS all those years ago? You should be away that if they were making exact duplicates IBM wouldn't have wasted any time unleashing their lawyers. The same would apply to Cyrix and AMD reverse engineering INTEL's CPUs. Cyrix and AMD wouldn't have had access to INTEL's production masks, so how did they do it? Now to answer your specific question - haven't you heard of products like SQL Sniffer that you can use to monitor a program's interaction with a database server. Of course, you don't need to get that sophisticated. I'd imagine that more than just one server that I know of would allow you to record this information as well. You should be able to monitor the log data as well and examine changes applied to the data. So, why exactly do you seem to think that its impossible?
> To answer your question, irrelevant as it is, yes, I do. I've got a Platnum
> Premier card from United to prove some of my travels and 22K miles on my
> year-old motorcycle to prove some of my travels. What does that have to do
> with databases? Wait, don't answer that. I already asked you a toughie.
> You'll need to put all of your energy into answering that one.
I don't have to. You misinterpreted what I said.
-am Received on Fri Dec 05 1997 - 00:00:00 CET