Re: Informix vs. Sybase vs. Oracle vs. (gasp) MS SQL Server
Date: 1997/12/01
Message-ID: <yutra7x9dht.fsf_at_mew.corp.sgi.com>#1/1
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Segel <Mikey_at_NOSPAM.King.of.MyDomain.NOSPAM.Segel.com> writes:
Michael> Michael> [ examples deleted ] Michael> Michael> True, you can write these with page level locks, Michael> however you won't get the performance, and you will Michael> have to write extra code to compensate.
What do you base your assertion that "you won't get the performance"? The applications you talked about are all applications that require a highly tuned application in order to get excellent performance.
For a finely tuned application, row level locking does *not* matter.
I don't see you producing any factual data to prove your point. I'd be more than happy to look at any factual and objective data you produce.
As for writing "extra code to compensate", this is a subjective remark. I think the code difference between the two is minor enough...
Michael> Sorry Pablo, defend Sybase on another point. Surely Michael> there are things that Sybase does that Informix Michael> can't right? I mean, take Oracle for instance. They Michael> have some neat indexing techniques that Informix Michael> lacks.
Honestly, this has nothing to do with Sybase. It has to do with marketing hype as I've said all along. You've swallowed the row-level is better than page-level pill. It sorta makes sense but unfortunately the facts don't support it. It's marketing hype.
- TPC information can be gleaned from www.tpc.org
--
Pablo Sanchez | Ph # (650) 933.3812 Fax # (650) 933.2821
pablo_at_sgi.com | Pg # (800) 930.5635 -or- pablo_p_at_pager.sgi.com
I am accountable for my actions. http://reality.sgi.com/pablo [ /Sybase_FAQ ]