Re: Informix vs. Sybase vs. Oracle vs. (gasp) MS SQL Server

In article <65jj2c$jhp5_at_news.ing.nl>, Jean-Marc van Leerdam <Jean- van.Leerdam_at_xxremovexx.ingbank.com> writes
>
>I think, even in a set-based thinking environment, it should not be
>the database that causes these problems. I strongly support the

   Correct. Sets contain tuples (rows). Sets do not contain    'pages' of tuples!!

   Set based = tuple based = row based.

   If you involve pages you involve the physical database design,    some the relational model is trying to abstract away.

   Otherwise we'd all still be handling disk sectors and pointers    from one disk structure to another...

   RELATIONAL THEORY IS TUPLE (i.e. row) BASED!!

>Jean-Marc.
>+------------------------------------------------------------+
>|Jean-Marc.van.Leerdam_at_| All opinions expressed are just ... |
>|ingbank.com | opinions (and my personal ones!). |
>+-- (AntiSpam:note the xxremovexx in the reply-to address) --+
>
 

-- 
David Williams