Re: Fragmentation in Oracle
Date: 1997/11/07
Message-ID: <640lim$82r$1_at_tor-nn1.netcom.ca>#1/1
By the way, do you work for Oracle? Your address is *.us.oracle.com?
Thomas Kyte wrote in message <346331ed.7800857_at_newshost>...
>On Thu, 6 Nov 1997 20:11:28 -0000, "Dave S." <dsingh_at_tgtsolutions.com>
wrote:
>
>>Try using an 80% (or higher) PCTUSED setting on the table. Please see
>>below.
>>
>>Also beware, Index space IS NEVER REUSED. If you add records, then delete
>>them, the index space is not release nor reused.
>>
>
>
>Thats not true. Index space is reused. (like a table, space is not
released to
>be used by other objects, but it is reused within the index).
>
>To show this, I created a table. I indexed a column in that table. Put
1,000
>rows in there. I repeatedly delete and add records to this table. After I
>delete 500 records and add 500 new records (using values never before seen
in
>the table), I analyze the index and dump the results. I do this over and
over
>and over. If Oracle never reused index space, we would expect the index to
grow
>infinitely large over time. In fact, the index never really grows -- it
reuses
>the space as it is freed up. the following table is the output of the
.<<<<< Data was removed to save space>>>>>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>[snip]
>
>Thomas Kyte
>tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
>Oracle Government
>Bethesda MD
>
>http://govt.us.oracle.com/ -- downloadable utilities
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle
Corporation
>
>Anti-Anti Spam Msg: if you want an answer emailed to you,
>you have to make it easy to get email to you. Any bounced
>email will be treated the same way i treat SPAM-- I delete it.
Received on Fri Nov 07 1997 - 00:00:00 CET