Re: Performance and reliability of c-tree vs. Sybase or Oracle

From: Pablo Sanchez <news_reader_at_mew.corp.sgi.com>
Date: 1997/05/30
Message-ID: <5mmpa0$2ar_at_mew.corp.sgi.com>#1/1

In article <338E3E3E.33A6_at_tusc.com.au>, Nigel McFarlane <nrm_at_tusc.com.au> writes:
> With attention to tuning, they still dislike SQL but admit the
> speed is workable.

Gosh darn that was a funny line!

--
Pablo Sanchez | wk: 415.933.3812| pg: 800.930.5635 -or- pablo_p_at_pager.sgi.com
--------------+-----------------+--------------------------------------------
pablo_at_sgi.com ... when mailing me, place "not spam" in the Subject

Received on Fri May 30 1997 - 00:00:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David J. Marzo: "USA-MA -- Sr. Software Engineer - Database Design / Process Design / Client Server / VAX-VMS"
Previous message: Laurie Kirsh: "Re: Can you install Oracle 7.3 on NT Workstation 4.0?"
Maybe in reply to: Josef Holzer: "Performance and reliability of c-tree vs. Sybase or Oracle"
In reply to Nigel McFarlane: "Re: Performance and reliability of c-tree vs. Sybase or Oracle"
Next in thread: Ken : "Re: Aborting PL/SQL script in Exception handler"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message