Re: Performance on NT: Oracle vs. SQLServer?

From: Joel Garry <joelga_at_rossinc.com>
Date: 1997/03/28
Message-ID: <1997Mar28.142900.23417_at_rossinc.com>#1/1


In article <01bc3ae7$2374e110$03060101_at_hercules> "NewsBoy//////////" <news_at_news.news> writes:
>Well put John. The SQL Server, lean and nimble. Its easier to steer and can
>react much faster than the Oracle. As far as robustness, yes the Oracle is
>more robust. I fyou anticiapate larger databases in the futrea nd cannot
>wait for the nexr relase of SQL Server, then go for Oracle. Otherwise, SQL
>Server's next release will suffice. Not sure of its exact release date yet.

I've always wondered how one can tell that the next release will be any good.

-- 
Joel Garry               joelga_at_rossinc.com               Compuserve 70661,1534
These are my opinions, not necessarily those of Ross Systems, Inc.   <> <>
%DCL-W-SOFTONEDGEDONTPUSH, Software On Edge - Don't Push.            \ V /
panic: ifree: freeing free inodes...                                   O
Received on Fri Mar 28 1997 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message