Re: Q: Raw device or UNIX filesystem... ?
From: Anton Dischner <dischner_at_med.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: 1996/12/03
Message-ID: <dischner-ya023280000312961037520001_at_news.lrz-muenchen.de>#1/1
Date: 1996/12/03
Message-ID: <dischner-ya023280000312961037520001_at_news.lrz-muenchen.de>#1/1
Filesystem is better in my opinion because modern file-caching even works better
than Oracle SGA-caching.
Use blocksize > 4k, max possible if you want better performance.
Kind regards,
Toni
In article <849409239.18342_at_dejanews.com>, danber_at_echo-on.net wrote:
> Which is better from all angles, e.g., performance, data integrity,
> recovery, maintenance, etc.?
>
> Any recommendation shall be highly appreciated. Thanks.
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
-- A. Dischner, SGI&AIX sysadmin, Oracle DBA | Don't let friends Institut fuer Klinische Chemie | use WinDose Klinikum Grosshadern | Just say NO. Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, GER | Marchioninistr.15 81366 Muenchen 49-89-70953202 |Received on Tue Dec 03 1996 - 00:00:00 CET