Re: Can Sybase and Oracle RDBs be designed in non first normal form? i.e. multivalues

From: David J. Roth <droth_at_sii.com>
Date: 1996/11/14
Message-ID: <01bbd222$e79f04e0$8b0ebe9b_at_droth.sii.com>#1/1


Oracle8 will support array and nested table data types. Release dates for Oracle8 have not been announced but I would guess at q2 or q3 97.

-- 
David J Roth
(My own opinions)

Dan and Clare McLaughlin <danjmcl_at_trader.com> wrote in article
<328A9777.795C_at_trader.com>...

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I hope someone out there can resolve a debate I am having with my boss.
>
> The debate started when we were discussing the Pick (Universe) database
>
> which we are running our legacy application on (and thankfully moving
>
> away from). As some of you may know, the Pick/Universe database supports
>
> "multi-values" in fields. In other words the database is not in first
>
> normal form. During the discussion I stated that a Sybase or Oracle
>
> database would never be designed using multi-values. I worked briefly
>
> with a Sybase database in my previous job and as far as I could tell
>
> this could not be done. My boss claims that you might want to use
>
> multi-values in a relational database to de-normalize and improve
>
> performance. I am new to this job and was really shocked when I first
>
> saw "multi-values" in a so called "relational" Pick/Universe database.
>
> In school I was trained on the merits of relational databases and how to
>
> de-nornmalize to improve performance, but I thought all relational
>
> databases were at least in first normal form. Is a Pick/Universe
>
> database really relational? Can Sybase and Oracle databases be designed
>
> using multivalues? I appreciate any comments concerning this.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 14 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message