Is MS-SQL6.5 in the same league as Oracle, Sybase?
Date: 1996/10/10
Message-ID: <325d6a01.1878874_at_news.thehub.com.au>#1/1
roussel_at_physics.mcgill.ca (Harold Roussel) wrote:
>The title says it all. I need to find a good SQL database system for
>handling up to 50 million records (database size of a few gigs) and I
>was wondering if I should limit my choice to Oracle or Sybase. What
>about advanced features like data encryption, mirroring, etc? Is
>MS-SQL up to the task? Thanks for any information.
>
Not from the press I have seen in relation to MS-SQLServer, although Microsoft
say they have an enterprise solution that is far from the truth without going
into too much detail here are a number of features that are part of Oracle that
are not in MS-SQLServer:
- Symmetric replication
- Full row-level locking
- Full parallel capabilities -Bit-mapped indexing
- Star query optimisation
- Object repository
- distributed optimiser (&distributed joins)
- User-defined functions
- Support for loosely-coupled systems
- Support for MPP systems
- Support for 64-bit memory systems
- Distributed join capability
- Hierarchical data-types
- Multi-protocol interchange
>
>
>//
>// Harold Roussel email: roussel_at_physics.mcgill.ca
>// Ph.D. student phone: (514) 398-6506
>// High Energy Physics
>// McGill University, Montréal, Québec
>//
>// Using OS/2 Warp and NT 3.51.
>//
>// "Mais je vais être frénétique et fulminant, il me faut une armée entière à
>// déconfire. J'ai dix coeurs, j'ai vingt bras. Il ne peut me suffire de
>// pourfendre des nains, il me faut des géants." Cyrano de Bergerac
>
Received on Thu Oct 10 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST