Re: Should my extents be bigger?

From: <bartavi_at_mail.tlm.openu.ac.il>
Date: 1996/10/01
Message-ID: <DyMC0B.GKA_at_cs.openu.ac.il>#1/1


gsa_at_li.net (Gary Assa) wrote:

>>I have a tablespace called TEMP with an initial_extent = 256,000
>> a next_extent = 1,048,576
>> a min_extents = 2
>> a max_extents = 121
>>(see below)
>>
>>The data file for the TEMP table has 524,288,000 bytes
>>(see below)
>>
>>It seems to me that since tablespace TEMP has a max_extents of 121, it
>>can use up
>>at most 1 * 256,000 (initial_extent) + 120 * 1,048,576 (next_extent)
>> = 256,000 + 125,829,120 = 126,085,120
>>
>TABLESPACES don't have these settings; TABLES do. If a TABLE has these

TABLESPACES do have those setting, which are default values for creating tables in the specified tablespace.

Bartal V.

>settings, it all depends on how much data is in it whether these
>settings are good. It is optimal to have all data in one extent, so
>if the table is <= 256k, you are good. Anything over that means
>multiple extents.
Received on Tue Oct 01 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message