Re: Two versions of Oracle on one NT macine

Fuzzy <grant_at_towersoft.com.au> wrote in article <3245d92b.0_at_red.interact.net.au>...
> adrian_at_a-cha.demon.co.uk (Adrian Challinor) wrote:
>
> >In article <3241d521.0_at_red.interact.net.au>,
> >grant_at_towersoft.com.au (Fuzzy) wrote:
 

> >> "DAVID DEVEJIAN" <djd_at_bank2000.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> You say you have a 3rd-party system that requires 7.2? You might want
> >> to verify this, as it stretches the bounds of believability. Ask the
> >> vendor exactly what it is about their product that requires 7.2, and
> >> then see if Oracle agrees. (Warning: This could well have been
> >> Herecles 13th task!)
> >>
 

> >Tha main reasons why V7.2 is supported and not V7.3 are:
 

> > a) SQL*NET V1 is not supported under V7.3. It is not even shipped. It
 is
> >possible to get it working, but thats a long way from supported.
 

> > b) All Pro*C code must be recompiled to run under 7.3 (according to the
> >release notes).
>
> Dave was talking about 7.1 and 7.2. I don't see any reference to 7.3
>

Correct. 7.1 and 7.2. While I am not sure, I believe the restriction is a result of Powerbuilder. They seem to have a different set of DLL's if one is to run against a 7.2 DB. Of course when I query the vendor, they are fairly clueless!

Once again if anyone can help get v7.2 and v7.1 running on the same NT box I would appreciate the help.

regards,
--Dave Received on Mon Sep 23 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST