Re: Q: Is RAID/striping good with Oracle???
Date: 1996/08/22
Message-ID: <321D151A.3FA6_at_nla.gov.au>#1/1
R. Wayne Linton, ISP wrote:
>
> netac wrote:
> >
> > Gary Assa wrote:
> > >
> > > Would RAID and striping be a good thing with Oracle 7?
Striping is what we call RAID1.
> > > Being that tables should be on different drives from indexes, etc.,
> > > is RAID defeating the purpose? Or is it an insignificant amount
> > > balanced by the speed of RAID?
> > >
> > > I am really not up on the way RAID works.
> > > --
> > > =========================================================
>
> We use RAID-5 which is really striping at the bit/byte level across
> several volumes.
RAID 1 through 5 are all striping variations.
RAID-5 is not necessarily BIT striping ... depends upon the implementation.
Striping at the bit level is RAID3 or 4.
The implementation of RAID5 we have here is 32Mb chunks not BITs :(.
> We also use RAID-0 which is actually mirroring entire
> volumes. I have striped a tablespace across four volumes, each of which
> is mirrored and with their own access path.
This is commonly referred to as RAID0+1
> RAID-5 runs on a single controller, so your path to the data is a single one.
If RAID5 is implemented at the OS level then you could have multiple controllers but most implementations are hardware boxes with a single SCSI connection. The SCSI is usually the first thing to get overloaded.
> The advantage of striping is that you can get several paths to the data
> (presuming the volumes are on different controllers.)
Bruce...
-- ----------------- T T T T T T T T Bruce Pihlamae I I I I I I I I bpihlama_at_nla.gov.au I I I I I I I I National Library of Australia T T T T T T T T Phone: +616 262-1575 ----------------- Fax: +616 273-2116 =================== "If you swallow a live frog first thing in the morning; nothing worse will happen to either of you that day."Received on Thu Aug 22 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST