Re: Developer 2000 1.3. Is it OK ?

From: Per Brondum <pbrondum_at_us.oracle.com>
Date: 1996/08/06
Message-ID: <32080BD6.4586_at_us.oracle.com>#1/1


Andrew J Davis wrote:
>
> In article: <3201D656.551D_at_pve.agro.nl> Peter de Wolff <P.C.de.Wolff_at_pve.agro.nl> writes:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to know if the new developer 2000 (1.3) works well. We now have
> > 1.2 and want to know if we can upgrade to 1.3. Do you recomend this or
> > is it better to wait untill the next version.
> >
> > Thanks for your replies
> >
> >
> Keep an eye on the server requirements. You need Oracle v.7.2.2 for
> 1.3 Designer/Developer. Oracle only ship 7.1.15 for VAX/VMS at present,
> so we can't use 1.3 until the end of the year for our VAXes.
>
> Personally I think Oracle should try harder to ensure porting of software is
> speeded up to avoid problems such as this!
> --
> Andrew J Davis
> DCTA
Developer/2000 1.3.1 works (just fine) against 7.1 and upwards. Where did you hear/read about the above restriction ?

-- 
Per Brondum						
Director
Product Management	
pbrondum_at_us.oracle.com
Developer/2000	Development
Received on Tue Aug 06 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message