Re: SQL*Net <--> Windows95

Paul Osborn wrote:

> Concerns would be:
> Is 16M RAM per client enough?
> Can they get away with upgrading to Oracle 7.1 and SQL*Net 2.1, i.e.
> does SQL*Net 2.1 support Windows95?

I would recommend using SQLNet 2.3. 2.1 is far to slow in connect time & hogs memory. 2.2 had problems. 2.3 runs fine and has drivers for win95 the others do not(asfaras i can remember).

Our environment 7.1 WGS on NTS 3.51

-- 
=======================================================
Dean Cunningham                     DeanC_at_wairc.govt.nz
Computer Facilities Supervisor  
Environment Waikato             
Hamilton,New Zealand
=======================================================