Re: SQL*Net <--> Windows95

From: Tony Noble <tnoble_at_mt.gov>
Date: 1996/07/22
Message-ID: <4t0t28$fnc_at_umt.umt.edu>#1/1


In article <4sr8ok$slb_at_nntp1.best.com>, posborn_at_menlosoftware.com says...
>
>Hi;
>
>A site is currently running Oracle 7.0.15 on a Pyramid server. They
>want to be able to connect to Windows95 clients (16M RAM, 486/Pentium)
>using SQL*Net 2.n.
>
>My question is: What is the least amount of upgrade pain they need to
>go through to be able to connect the Windows95 clients to the Pyramid
>server using SQL*Net 2.n?
>
>Concerns would be:
>Is 16M RAM per client enough?
>Can they get away with upgrading to Oracle 7.1 and SQL*Net 2.1, i.e.
>does SQL*Net 2.1 support Windows95?
>
>Thanks,
>Paul
>
We have run sqlnet under win95 with only 16meg of ram. We currently use sqlnet 2.1.4.1.4c, tcp/ip adaptor 2.1.4.1.3c, spx/ipx adaptor 2.1.4.1.3c on the client with any sqlnet equal to or higher than 2.1.4 on the server. The spx/ipx is not supported under win95, but seems to work ok.

-- 
Tony Noble
tnoble_at_mt.gov
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Received on Mon Jul 22 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message