Re: Mirrored disks Vs duplexed logs
Date: 1996/07/16
Message-ID: <4sf7s8$a1c_at_scel.sequent.com>#1/1
jared_at_psnw.com (Jared Still) writes:
>Deleting a tablespace data file is an error that can be recovered from
>without data loss.
>Deleting a unarchived non-mirrored redo log file _will_ result in
>data loss.
It should also be noted that thanks to a "feature" of the UNIX filesystem the removal of a database file (whether tablespace data or redo log) will not immediately take down the database. The server processes for the instance which have the file open will be able to continue performing I/O to the file. An error will only be returned on the next attempt to open the file. Which, for a tablespace data file, will typically be on the next connection to the database (i.e., when the next oracle shadow is started). It's conceivable that the removal of a data file would not be noticed until the next instance warmstart. The loss of a redo log would be noticed the next time a switch to that log occurs, not when the next write to the log is performed by the ora_lgwr process.
-- Kurtis D. Rader, Senior Consultant krader_at_sequent.com (email) Sequent Computer Systems +1 503/578-3714 (voice) +65 223-5116 (fax) 80 Robinson Road, #18-03 Currently on assignment in the Singapore, 0106 Asia-Pacific regionReceived on Tue Jul 16 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST