Re: Flat File Formats definitions

From: Mark E. Porterfield <porterf_at_primenet.com>
Date: 1996/05/31
Message-ID: <4omqvh$fp5_at_nnrp1.news.primenet.com>#1/1


In article <31ADB510.2584_at_sth.frontec.se>, David Larsson <David.Larsson_at_sth.frontec.se> wrote:
>WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE A BUNCH OF JPEGS?
>
>We are doing a survey on the structure of inhouse flat-file formats
>people use when transfering data betwen applications.
>We are a Messaging company working mostly with EDI. I know this question

	There is a "standard" format for EDI as I recall.  Each company
	tends to enhance it a bit.

>might not be appropriate for these groups but there are not
>messaging group, and furthermore, messaging applications are
>often used with huge database systems that communicates with other
>huge systems.
>If you have plenty of flat-file definitions don't send all if most
>are of the same type. What I would like is as different and strange
>types of flat-files that exists. If the definition is awkward to
>understand please add an example too.
>
>If you like, I'll send to you a bunch of jpegs of sexual nature
>for your corporation. Write JPEG in the subject line if you
>want jpeg:s .

        Please don't send any to me...was this really important to include?
>--
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>
> David Larsson E-mail: David.Larsson_at_sth.frontec.se
> Frontec Software Development WWW...: http://www.csd.uu.se/~davidl
> Senior Software Developer Tel...: +46 (8) 470 22 44
>
> "It's nice to be important,
> but more important to be nice!"
> """""""
> } . . {
>___________________________ooO____U____Ooo___________________________

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark E. Porterfield
porterf_at_primenet.com
The Deloitte & Touche Consulting Group
Received on Fri May 31 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message