Re: NT Workgroups vs Enterprise

On Sun, 12 May 1996 03:26:47 GMT, widsith_at_panix.com wrote:

>robert_at_cpvax.cpses.tu.com (Robert Eden) wrote:
>
>>We are considering moving our small (30 client, 1 GB) client-server
>>application from Unix to a NT server. We've been quoted costs of around
>>2k per client (60k total!) for the Enterprise Server NT and
>>$300 per client (9k total) for the Workgroup Server.
>......
>
>I have been told several times that the Enterprise and Workgroup
>products utilize the kernel, so there should be minimal differences if
>you are not using any add-ons. (there is an earlier thread discussing
>the fact that one user is experiencing a 2x performance differences,
>but that is the only case I have heard of) I do believe that the
>Workgroup server can utilize a remote table, although there may be
>ways with the Enterprise to make this more efficient.
>

 ....
>Hope this helps, >Dave Devejian >widsith_at_panix.com
>
>

Would appreciate any performance comparison between the Oracle Enterprise for NT & the WorkGroup equivalent. Is there a major difference in performance? If so are they 2 different products (or just one is a subset of another?).

Regards

Ali Guidoum
aguidoum_at_emirates.net.ae Received on Thu May 16 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST