Re: Running 8 instances of oracle on a sparc 20 - Need Advice

From: Strategic Data Systems <sds_at_dataplusnet.com>
Date: 1996/05/15
Message-ID: <4nd3hc$cft_at_news.inc.net>#1/1


In article <4nb2du$6p9_at_earth.njcc.com>, mel_at_pluto.njcc.com says...
>
>
>
>I'm looking for recommendations.
>
>In our development environment we need to keep a number of oracle databases
>running for testing purposes.
>
>We have the following machine running 4 instances of Oracle (small):
>
> Sparc 20
> 128 Meg
> 1 CPU
> A 1.05 Gig disk with the operating system on it
> A 1 2.1 Gig disk with oracle files on it
> A 1.05 Gig disk with oracle files on it
>
>We need to run 4 MORE instances, and I'm trying to determine which would
>be better/cheaper in hardware as well as man hours to set up. Does anyone
>out there run 8 instances of oracle on a single machine?
>
>The choice is:
>
> 1. Upgrade our current machine
> more disks
> another cpu
> more memory
>
> 2. Another sparc 20
>
>Are there any reasons to pick one option over the other?
>
>
>

Any reason you are not using schemas within the instances?

This would potentially reduce the memory requirements. Received on Wed May 15 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message