Re: DB Backup on HP-UX 10.01

From: John Leon Guerrero <jguerrer_at_best.com>
Date: 1996/04/02
Message-ID: <4jqkui$jfo_at_nntp1.best.com>#1/1


Writes to datafiles occur just like normal during hot backups. An "administrative change" is made for media recovery and redo writes can be larger for data blocks in the hot backup tablespaces.

Warm regards,
John E. Leon Guerrero
Database consultant
Infogration, Inc

Timo Haatainen <Timo.Haatainen_at_ttgroup.fi> wrote:

>Jay Mehta wrote:
>>
>> Timo Haatainen <Timo.Haatainen_at_ttgroup.fi> wrote:
>> >I have found that fbackup is not a suitable utility for
>> >Oracle hot backups. This is because fbackup recognizes 'files
>> >in use' during backup and retries backup it again.
>> >Needless to say, Oracle-files are usually heavily accessed. So I
>> >use tar for db backups (hot ones).
>> >
>> >Timo Haatainen
>>
>> Could you please explain in more details why fbackup is not suitable for
>> Oracle hot backup?
>>
>> Please correct me if I am wrong, but Oracle datafiles are not in use
>> during hot backup. Instead redo logs get all the traffic. We use fbackup
>> to backup hot as well as cold datafiles on HP/UX 10.
>>
>> Jay Mehta
>> DBA
 
>I don't more about the matter than that I tried to use fbackup for a hot
>backup and fbackup tried to backup at least twice some datafiles (200
>MB+). I called Oracle Support and HP. If I remember right Oracle said
>that there may be some changes to datafile even if it is said to be
>backed up (status of file etc... (I don't know)). And that's why fbackup
>tries to read the file again.
>If I were you I would check the logs produced by fbackup to ensure there
>is no retries on datafiles. If none then no problem, otherwise I would
>consider to change the tool (now I use tar for hot datafiles, otherwise
>fbackup).
 

>Timo Haatainen
Received on Tue Apr 02 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message