Re: Designer 2000 question

From: jcd <jcd_at_rhh.dk>
Date: 1996/02/26
Message-ID: <4gruiv$a6h_at_news.dknet.dk>#1/1


Damn - I'm getting old and careless here - I forgot the most important thing:

It's true that Designer/2000 could display a database field as a GUI item *if* the field belonged to at domain with a fixed number of values (or if there was a fixed number of allowable values for the field).

However in the case I was referring to this was not the case (we did not want to limit the allowable values at compile-time but only at run-time, since we are dealing with a fairly dynamic system).

Please take this into account when reading my post.

Sorry for the slip - I'll go beat myself up any minute now, hopefully that'll teach me to think more before acting.

jcd (jcd_at_rhh.dk) wrote:
: Jerry Silver (jsilver_at_ca.oracle.com) wrote:
: : I have no idea what this guy (Jacob) is ranting about. Designer/2000
: : is perfectly capable of generating "GUI" items, including combo
: : boxes, that are bound to database columns. From the online help
: : for the forms generator:
: :
 

: [Extract from the online help deleted]
 

: Well as I wrote in my original reply the documentation *claims* that this
: is possible (we do know how to read) but it did *not* work. We then
: contacted Oracle Support (Denmark) and asked why it didn't work when the
: documentation said it should. Oracle Support then informed us that the
: documentation was incorrect and that we should not expect it to work.
 

: So the natural question here is: Have you actually tried this or are you
: relying on the claims of the documentation.
 

: Another possibility is that this was only a problem in release 1.1 of
: designer/2000.
 

: Have a nice day.
 

: /Jacob
 

: --
: Jacob Steen Due RAMBOLL
 

: email: jcd_at_ramboll.dk
 

: 'The opinions expressed by me are my own, not my employers - I think'

--
Jacob Steen Due                              RAMBOLL INformatics and Management 

email: jcd_at_ramboll.dk

'The opinions expressed by me are my own, not my employers - I think'
Received on Mon Feb 26 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message