Re: Fastest: Embedded SQL or OCI ?
Date: 1996/02/25
Message-ID: <4gpnpe$kfp_at_nuntius.u-net.net>#1/1
Young_Charles <cyoung> wrote:
>hage_at_telepost.no (Erik Hage) wrote:
>>Any info appreciated:
>>
>>Does anybody know which of the two is the fastest:
>>Embedded SQL or OCI? (using Windows 3.11).
>>
>>bjorn-tore.dale_at_merkantildata.no (Bjoern-Tore Dale)
>My experience is that the OCI routines are about 50% faster than embedded
>SQL, using C and C++ on various Unix boxes. The primary reason for this,
>as far as I can tell, is that the OCI routines are written in assembly(!).
>I don't know if this holds true for Windows or any other non-Unix platform.
>Chip
As far as I know the ProC preprocessor only converts the embedded SQL into OCI calls, so it's basically the same.
Thomas Christensen Received on Sun Feb 25 1996 - 00:00:00 CET