Re: Does anyone think this group needs splitting into subgroups?

So most agree it's a good idea. How do we go about actually doing it?????

...gary

Benoit.Stephenson_at_dmr.ca (Benoît Stephenson) wrote:

>johnb_at_jbracken.demon.co.uk (John Bracken) wrote:
 

>>gnilges_at_qni.com (Gary Nilges) wrote:
 

>>>excellant idea, IMHO.
 

>>>...gary
 

>>>Clint Redwood <clint_at_kheldar.demon.co.uk> wrote:
 

>>>>How about following subgroups?
 

>>>>forms
>>>>reports
>>>>dba
>>>>sql
>>>>jobs
 

>>>>etc...
 

>>>>I'd certainly make this group easier to read!

>>Yep I agree. Break it down, the Oracle spectrum of products spans too
>>far a chasm for anyone to know all answers to all questions, and I'm
>>getting a bit tired of downloading Mickey Mouse
>>Developer/Discoverer/Designer questions which can be answered by 1)
>>Phoning World Wide support (if you have a license) and 2) Questions
>>which can be answered by RTFM.
 

>>A good DBA forum would be nice with OCI and developer items moved into
>>another group!

>I agree!
Received on Thu Feb 22 1996 - 00:00:00 CET