Re: Does anyone think this group needs splitting into subgroups?

From: SV Singam <vijia_at_pop.jaring.my>
Date: 1996/02/15
Message-ID: <4fukk3$h23_at_jaring.my>#1/1


Clint Redwood <clint_at_kheldar.demon.co.uk> wrote: ...

>How about following subgroups?
 

>forms
>reports
>dba
>sql
>jobs
 

>etc...

I agree.

  SV Singam
Minden, Penang

Truth, viewed from any angle, remains truth. Received on Thu Feb 15 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message