Re: Oracle replication wasRe: Sybase 11 TPCC on DEC (your comments please)

From: Dave Quinn <dquinn_at_uk.oracle.com>
Date: 1996/02/05
Message-ID: <4f52qk$6p5_at_inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>#1/1


>While with the two-phased commit strategy you can be sure that all
>replicate databases are consistent at any given time with the primary,
>performance does suffer and the possibility of transaction rollback at
>all sites increases with each replicate database entered into the
>system - if one replicate database is unavailable, the transaction
>fails at all sites.

Sorry, that is incorrect. Symmetric replication maintains queues for each site involved and replicates to each queue independantly. I.e if a change must be replicated to 2 sites then that produces 2 queued entries. Each one is dealt with separately - the availability of one machine will not prevent a change at another.

I am assuming you are comparing like with like here - replication server vs symmetric replication and not replication server vs Oracle7 + Distributed Option.

Dave Received on Mon Feb 05 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message