Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP
Date: 1996/01/15
Message-ID: <1f7cc$d102f.327_at_murdoch.systems.sa.gov.au>#1/1
Martin Jörg <joerg_at_birag.ch> wrote:
>Dennis M. Gray wrote:
>>
>> Steve Harville <76163.3553_at_compuserve.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>I wonder if anybody has experience with or already done evaluation of
>> >>MsWindows TCP/IP stacks (e.g. Trumpet, Metmanage, ... .. products) for
>> >>Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP. Which one do you think is better and works
>> >>smoothly or at least you are satisfied with?
>> >>
>> >
>> >The tcpip stack in win95 and windows nt works fine for us.
>> >
>>
>> What about Trumpet Winsock? My idea is to have Trumpet running under
>> Windows 3.11 with an Oracle server on a Linux machine. I have a long
>> way to go on getting the server up and running so there is no hurry on
>> this but would appreciate comments.
>The tcp/ip stack in win95/NT as well on wfw3.11 (same implementation) works also fine for us and
>last but not least, dont forget some other benefits:
>- Cost: 0$
>- very easy to configure
>- bether integrated in windows than any other stack i have seen
I think Trumpet would be a pretty bad choice, From my home use I have found it to be pretty unreliable once the connection has been up for more than a couple of hours. We use the stack provided with nt here at my work and it's seems pretty fine.
cheers,
Tony Sampson
DBA/software terrorist, South Australian Government Financing Authority sampson_at_dtf.sa.gov.au
The unnatural, that too is natural.
Goethe
Received on Mon Jan 15 1996 - 00:00:00 CET